Wednesday, April 30, 2014

Why do people hate airports? The Shadow knows


TL;DR

People opposed to airports are not really annoyed by the noise, or worried about pollution or crashes. They are, instead, afraid of the shadow that the airplane makes on the ground.

ahem

The smaller airports in this country are under constant attack, by the people - it should come as no surprise - who don't use them. People buy houses next to them and wake up one day and ask,

"Who put this airport here?? It wasn't here yesterday! Where's my torch and pitchfork??"



The people then write letters to their city council representatives and a long, expensive legal battle ensues (no pun intended.) Eventually the airport must be shut down, due to sheer exhaustion.

Why do people do this? Why do they hate airports so much? Ignoring why they moved there in the first place, why don't they wake up and say, "Oh cool! We're near an airport! We can go flying any time!" ?

People claim there are many reasons:

Noise

When a jet airplane takes off, there's little argument that it makes a lot of noise. There's no mystery to it: Engines designed around a constant explosion going off in mid-air tend to squeak a little.

This makes one wonder: Why didn't the people buying the houses know about the airport with all the noise? Do the planes have a "stealth mode" that they enable during Sunday open houses ?

Hardly. Jet operations - or even propeller operations - simply don't occur that often. Even the busiest airports only have a take-off on average every 10 minutes, and that includes little propeller planes. The fastest an airport can launch a jet is basically every 2 minutes. In the grand scheme of things, you're more likely to hear a chopper or muscle car pass before an airplane.

Clearly the issue isn't noise.

Crashes

Airplanes crash. Occasionally. If you're under it when it does, you're going to have a bad time.

But does it really occur that often? The embattled airport of Santa Monica is a fairly busy airport with about 300 operations per day. Yet, it only experiences on average one crash per year.

Note that this includes non-fatal non-damaging off-airport landings.

Compare this with the streets around your house. On any city block, there is a crash every week. In any city, there are thousands of crashes per year and, for example, Los Angeles sees about 300 deaths per year.

But that's not all! People even get into cars, and go traveling in them on these roads! In fact, they hurl themselves at life-threatening speeds! They even do it *across the paths* of other drivers! Why, you can't go a single block before crossing what's called an "intersection" where dozens of other drivers are speeding too - *perpendicular* to their path!

But not being in a car doesn't save you. Los Angeles also recently received the honor of being the deadliest place in America for pedestrians.

With such devastation, it's a wonder anyone puts their house so close to such "arteries of death"!

Compared to this devastation, once-a-year pace of airplane crashes are as legendary as unicorns.

Clearly the issue isn't crashes.

Pollution

What do the environmentalists claim kills more people than car crashes ? Pollution from cars, trucks and airplanes.

"Airplanes! There they are again!"

People dislike the pollution produced by airplanes, but apparently don't mind the pollution from cars and trucks. Why is this?

Surely it can't be the amount. Taking Santa Monica again, the city might experience 150 take-offs a day (again, including the little prop planes.) (Airplanes don't burn much gas landing.) The airplane will travel down Rose, and over the ocean never to be seen again. That's what? 2 miles?

Compare this with the thousands of cars driving all over the city, each covering dozens of miles. To get to work, my own car travels through 10 miles of Santa Monica, and again when I go home.

And of course, I'm not alone. The commute includes so many cars, that the West Side has some of the worst traffic in the world.

The 10 and 405 intersection are also in Santa Monica (maybe Mar Vista) carrying its share of the cargo trucks coming out of Long Beach, along with buses, etc.

"But isn't the pollution from a single plane spread over a wider area ?"

Yes, and this makes it less potent. If you want to get technical, the parts per million (PPM) is much lower.

Again, the airplane's contribution is tiny.

Clearly the issue isn't pollution

What then is the problem ???

The only reason that I can think of, why people hate airports and airplanes, is that they are afraid of the shadow that the airplane makes as it passes over them.



I'm not being coy. There is research to back me up. When a shadow passes over us, it produces a visceral, primitive reaction in our lizard brains. It is powerful and uncontrollable.

When a shadow passes over us, our instinct is that a predatory bird is about to pounce on us and eat us. Think of all the prairie dogs and chickens who dive for cover when a hawk or eagle passes over. They can't hear the raptors coming and so have to keep a look out.



To see this for yourself, find a pool of water containing mosquito larvae. Wave your hand over the pool and watch the larvae run (well, wiggle) to the bottom. If you do it long enough, you will drown them.

We evolved from the same scampering rat that these other animals did, that same first mammal who had to run in fear from much taller dinosaurs. That same panic reaction wells up in us when a shadow crosses us.



When you look at it this way, it's really no wonder why people hate airplanes. They cause us a lot of stress.

How do we fix this ?

The solution is to remove the shadows obviously. One way to do this would be to produce so much pollution - as much pollution as Hong Kong - that the sun never shines. It is widely known that people in China do not fear airplanes. In fact, the Chinese word for airplane translates roughly as, "What's that noise above us?"



Another solution comes from the comic book world, of all places. If the airplanes were transparent, they obviously wouldn't produce a shadow. Yes, I'm suggesting we should license the invisible jet technology from the Amazons of Themyscira, who Wonder Woman is a member of.



No, that would never work because we'd never find their invisible island.

Therefore I would propose that we just get over it.

Tuesday, April 15, 2014

Hypocrisy

"Why is it that, in 2014, affluent communities like Santa Monica, Mar Vista and Venice must suffer these horrendous health and safety impacts as part of daily life?"

Darn straight! That's for the poor neighborhoods!

Unless, of course, you buy a house in a flight path. Not that it matters because you'll be killed by automobile exhaust or impact first.

http://www.santamonicanext.org/jonathan-steins-open-letter-on-lawsuit-opposing-referendum-to-save-smo/

CBP (still) performing illegal stops of aircraft


The contents of this post are not news to general aviation (GA) pilots. AOPA (the lobbying group for pilots) and others have reported that the Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) have been stopping small aircraft, apparently looking for concealed drugs. The CBP have been doing this without any probable cause. Worse, the CBP has no jurisdiction over aviation (only the FAA does, unless a plane crosses the national border). Even worse, the CBP (and the agents they employ - sheriffs and SWAT teams) don't know anything about airplanes. For instance, they don't know that if a dog walks across a wing, it will be ruined or that if anything is removed from a plane, the plane becomes illegal to fly unless put back together and inspected by an IA. In other words, these searches strand pilots in remote places (think middle of Utah, no offense to Utah-ites).

I don't know what the reader's opinion of the stop-and-frisk activities going on in New York and Los Angeles (and other cities almost certainly). I think they are useless and even harmful. They are useless because stopping a random person will, almost certainly, not catch a criminal in the act. A "criminal" might be walking around with drugs or a weapon that they ought not to have, but it is just as likely that a perfectly law abiding citizen might be too, and far more likely that the individual stopped isn't doing anything remotely illegal.

The stops are harmful because they erode the foundations of the country. Our country is based on the idea that, if I pull my weight, everyone else will and the country will succeed. If someone is going to be stopped by the police regardless, what is their incentive to behave legally ? If someone is going to be arrested for possessing any of the thousands of items that the government has declared to be illegal (for example, eagle feathers, or any plant or animal declared illegal by any country in the world), then it creates a threat to every citizen that law enforcement can wield any time that it wishes to threaten someone. Write an unflattering newspaper article (or blog post) ? Get stopped, searched and arrested.

The fact that both urban blacks and affluent pilots are getting stopped should be raising alarms and calling people to action. Law enforcement is making a power grab, they really aren't afraid of any particular group and won't stop until the courts tell them that they will suffer unless they stop. These actions should be uniting citizens in this effort.

Last year in the Atlantic:

http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/05/annals-of-the-security-state-more-airplane-stories/276018/

Today in the Los Angeles Times:

http://www.latimes.com/local/la-me-aircraft-searches-20140415,0,7828658.story

[edit]

Also picked up by Mint Press News:

http://www.mintpressnews.com/feds-searches-private-planes-dont-fly-pilots-lawmakers/189436/

Tuesday, April 8, 2014

On justice

http://jjie.org/op-ed-for-a-kid-of-color-unavoidable-contact-with-the-cops/106637/